top of page

Community Anchor

cutaxon.jpg

User Research in a Complex Civic System

Firm: Perkins&Will

Duration: 1.5yrs & ongoing

Problem

How could the City define a future vision for the Carver Museum that authentically reflected the values of Austin’s Black community—while remaining feasible, phased, and approvable within public-sector constraints?

Context & Constraints

  • Historically marginalized community with deep sensitivity around representation

  • Fixed public-sector budgets and governance requirements

  • COVID-era limitations that restricted in-person engagement

  • Uneven access to digital tools among community members

The success of this project depended as much on how decisions were made as on the final design outcome.

Users & Stakeholders

  • Worked across seven primary stakeholder groups, including:

  • Black artists and cultural practitioners

  • Older community members

  • Museum staff

  • Civic and community leaders

  • City of Austin staff

  • Several participants lacked reliable internet access, requiring phone-based engagement.

online survey results.jpg

Research & Inputs

  • Online survey focused on user interaction & desires 

  • Stakeholder interviews and community listening sessions

  • Phone-based outreach to ensure inclusive participation during COVID

  • Parallel interviews with City staff to understand institutional goals and constraints

  • Research focused on surfacing decision-relevant insights, not exhaustive documentation.

Decision Framework

Synthesized qualitative insights into a set of guiding principles that:

  • Reflected lived community experience

  • Aligned with City feasibility, funding, and approval constraints

  • Provided a shared lens for evaluating design options

These principles were translated into phased architectural and programmatic strategies and communicated through clear, accessible visuals for non-technical audiences.

Guiding Principles.jpg

Tradeoffs

  • Scope vs. Budget: Community needs exceeded initial funding assumptions. I worked with City staff to identify realistic phasing and alternative funding strategies rather than quietly reducing scope.

  • Representation vs. Feasibility: Plain-language visuals were used to explain constraints clearly, preserving trust while setting expectations.

Design goals2.jpg

Outcomes

  • Delivered a phased, research-driven expansion strategy

  • Secured unanimous approval from community stakeholders and City Council

  • Embedded accessibility as a foundational requirement

  • Built long-term community trust through an inclusive, transparent process

Porposed Plan.jpg
bottom of page